Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1928

Semet-Solvay Co. v. The Commissioner of Patents

[1929] SCR 172
EvidenceJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Semet-Solvay Co. v. The Commissioner of Patents Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1928-11-28 Report [1929] SCR 172 Judges Duff, Lyman Poore; Mignault, Pierre-Basile; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Lamont, John Henderson; Smith, Robert On appeal from Canada Subjects Intellectual property Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Semet-Solvay Co. v. The Commissioner of Patents, [1929] S.C.R. 172 Date: 1928-11-28 Semet-Solvay Company Appellant; and The Commissioner Of Patents Respondent. 1928: November 27, 28. Present: Duff, Mignault, Newcombe, Lamont and Smith JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE EXCHEQUER COURT OF CANADA Patent—Refusal by Commissioner of Patents of application for patent— Want of invention—Improvements in coke ovens. APPEAL from the judgment of Maclean J., President of the Exchequer Court of Canada[1] dismissing the present appellant’s appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents refusing an application for patent made by the appellant’s assignor; the alleged invention relating to improvements in coke ovens. On conclusion of the argument of counsel for the appellant, the Court retired for consideration of the case, and on returning to the Bench, without calling on counsel for the respondent, delivered judgment dismissing the appeal, on the ground that the Court could see no reason for disagreeing with the view of the learned President of the Exchequer Court that there was no satisfactory evidence of invention. With regard to the other points in dispute, the Court …

Read full judgment
Semet-Solvay Co. v. The Commissioner of Patents
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1928-11-28
Report
[1929] SCR 172
Judges
Duff, Lyman Poore; Mignault, Pierre-Basile; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Lamont, John Henderson; Smith, Robert
On appeal from
Canada
Subjects
Intellectual property
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Semet-Solvay Co. v. The Commissioner of Patents, [1929] S.C.R. 172
Date: 1928-11-28
Semet-Solvay Company Appellant;
and
The Commissioner Of Patents Respondent.
1928: November 27, 28.
Present: Duff, Mignault, Newcombe, Lamont and Smith JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE EXCHEQUER COURT OF CANADA
Patent—Refusal by Commissioner of Patents of application for patent— Want of invention—Improvements in coke ovens.
APPEAL from the judgment of Maclean J., President of the Exchequer Court of Canada[1] dismissing the present appellant’s appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents refusing an application for patent made by the appellant’s assignor; the alleged invention relating to improvements in coke ovens. On conclusion of the argument of counsel for the appellant, the Court retired for consideration of the case, and on returning to the Bench, without calling on counsel for the respondent, delivered judgment dismissing the appeal, on the ground that the Court could see no reason for disagreeing with the view of the learned President of the Exchequer Court that there was no satisfactory evidence of invention. With regard to the other points in dispute, the Court pointed out that it must be distinctly understood that it expressed no opinion thereon.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
R. S. Smart K.C. for the appellant.
A. W. Anglin K.C. and C. P. Plaxton K.C. for the respondent.
[1] [1927] Ex. C.R. 218.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases