Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1918

Eckert v. London Electric Railway Co.

(1918) 57 SCR 610
ContractJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Eckert v. London Electric Railway Co. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1918-12-23 Report (1918) 57 SCR 610 On appeal from Ontario Subjects Contract Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Eckert v. London Electric Railway Co., (1918) 57 S.C.R. 610 Date: 1918-12-23 Eckert and London Electric Railway Co. 1918: December 9, 23. ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ONTARIO. Contract—Sale of Copper—Quantity—Evidence. APPEAL from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario[1], reversing the judgment at the trial in favour of the defendant (appellant). The respondents sued for the price of copper wire sold to appellant who counterclaimed for damages on account of a deficiency in the quantity agreed upon. The contract was verbal, the appellant offering to buy and the respondents to sell the wire the latter had on hand, which was represented to be about seventy tons. It turned out that respondents only had a little over fifty tons and the appellant claimed damages for breach of the contract. The trial judge held that the contract was for a specific quantity, but his judgment was reversed by the Appellate Division, which held that on the evidence respondents only agreed to sell the quantity they had on hand. The Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel and reserving judgment, dismissed the appeal. Appeal dismissed with costs. Tilley K.C. for the appellant. D.L. McCarthy K.C. for the respondents. [1] 40 Ont. L.R. 208. …

Read full judgment
Eckert v. London Electric Railway Co.
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1918-12-23
Report
(1918) 57 SCR 610
On appeal from
Ontario
Subjects
Contract
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Eckert v. London Electric Railway Co., (1918) 57 S.C.R. 610
Date: 1918-12-23
Eckert
and
London Electric Railway Co.
1918: December 9, 23.
ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ONTARIO.
Contract—Sale of Copper—Quantity—Evidence.
APPEAL from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario[1], reversing the judgment at the trial in favour of the defendant (appellant).
The respondents sued for the price of copper wire sold to appellant who counterclaimed for damages on account of a deficiency in the quantity agreed upon. The contract was verbal, the appellant offering to buy and the respondents to sell the wire the latter had on hand, which was represented to be about seventy tons. It turned out that respondents only had a little over fifty tons and the appellant claimed damages for breach of the contract.
The trial judge held that the contract was for a specific quantity, but his judgment was reversed by the Appellate Division, which held that on the evidence respondents only agreed to sell the quantity they had on hand.
The Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel and reserving judgment, dismissed the appeal.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Tilley K.C. for the appellant.
D.L. McCarthy K.C. for the respondents.
[1] 40 Ont. L.R. 208.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases