Amerey v. Canada
Court headnote
Amerey v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-12-12 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 428 File numbers A-30-05 Decision Content Date: 20051212 Docket: A-30-05 Citation: 2005 FCA 428 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: AWID, AHMED, MAHMOUD AND MOHAMMED AMEREY Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on December 12, 2005. Judgment delivered at Edmonton, Alberta, on December 12, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NOËL J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. MALONE J.A. Date: 20051212 Docket: A-30-05 Citation: 2005 FCA 428 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: AWID, AHMED, MAHMOUD AND MOHAMMED AMEREY Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Judgment Rendered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on December 12, 2005) [1] This appeal is from a Judgment rendered by Judge McArthur of the Tax Court of Canada pursuant to the informal procedure. The Tax Court Judge was confronted with convoluted evidence involving numerous contradictions tendered by both the Appellants and the Respondent. [2] In the end the Tax Court Judge opted to split the figures advanced by the parties down the middle as he could find no better way to resolve the dispute. After hearing extensive arguments by both parties on appeal, we understand the difficult situation in which the Tax Court Judge found himself, and have not been persuaded that his judgment should be interfered with. [3] With respect to the…
Read full judgment
Amerey v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-12-12 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 428 File numbers A-30-05 Decision Content Date: 20051212 Docket: A-30-05 Citation: 2005 FCA 428 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: AWID, AHMED, MAHMOUD AND MOHAMMED AMEREY Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on December 12, 2005. Judgment delivered at Edmonton, Alberta, on December 12, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NOËL J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. MALONE J.A. Date: 20051212 Docket: A-30-05 Citation: 2005 FCA 428 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: AWID, AHMED, MAHMOUD AND MOHAMMED AMEREY Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Judgment Rendered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on December 12, 2005) [1] This appeal is from a Judgment rendered by Judge McArthur of the Tax Court of Canada pursuant to the informal procedure. The Tax Court Judge was confronted with convoluted evidence involving numerous contradictions tendered by both the Appellants and the Respondent. [2] In the end the Tax Court Judge opted to split the figures advanced by the parties down the middle as he could find no better way to resolve the dispute. After hearing extensive arguments by both parties on appeal, we understand the difficult situation in which the Tax Court Judge found himself, and have not been persuaded that his judgment should be interfered with. [3] With respect to the interlocutory decision of the Tax Court Judge holding that the Appellants as partners were properly assessed rather than their corporation, we were presented with no authority which would allow us to detract from the conclusion reached by the Tax Court Judge. [4] The appeal will be dismissed with costs of $1,500, inclusive of fees and disbursements, to the Respondent. "Marc Noël" _______________________ Judge FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-30-05 (APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF JUDGE McARTHUR, TAX COURT OF CANADA) STYLE OF CAUSE: Awid, Ahmed, Mahmoud and Mohammed Amerey v. Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING: Edmonton, Alberta DATE OF HEARING: December 12, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN, NOËL, MALONE, JJA. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NOËL J.A. APPEARANCES: Norm Assiff for the Appellants Marta Burns for the Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Chadi & Company 1901, 10060 Jasper Avenue EDMONTON, Alberta T5J 3R8 for the Appellants John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada OTTAWA, Ontario K1A 0H8 for the Respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca