Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1918

The King v. Bonhomme

(1918) 59 SCR 679
Aboriginal/IndigenousJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

The King v. Bonhomme Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1918-06-10 Report (1918) 59 SCR 679 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Anglin, Francis Alexander; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe On appeal from Canada Subjects Aboriginal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada The King v. Bonhomme, (1918) 59 S.C.R. 679 Date: 1918-06-10 His Majesty The King v. Bonhomme. 1918: May 28; 1918: June 10. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Anglin and Brodeur JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE EXCHEQUER COURT OF CANADA. Crown grant—Indian lands—Adverse possession. APPEAL from the judgment of the Exchequer Court of Canada[1], dismissing the action of the plaintiff appellant. This is an information of intrusion exhibited by the Attorney-General of Canada, whereby it is claimed that the Island of St. Nicholas, situate in navigable waters of the River St. Lawrence, in Lake St. Louis, be declared a portion of the Caughnawaga Indian Reserve and that the possession of the island be given the Indians. On the other hand, the Province of Quebec, claiming the ownership of the island, sold it in 1906 to the respondent. The Supreme Court of Canada, after argument, reserved judgment and eventually affirmed the judgment of the Exchequer Court. Appeal dismissed with costs. F. J. Bisaillon K.C. and P. St. Germain K.C. for the appellant. F. L. Beique K.C. and N. A. Belcourt K.C. for the respondent. [1] 16 Ex. C.R. 437; 38 D.L.R. 647. …

Read full judgment
The King v. Bonhomme
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1918-06-10
Report
(1918) 59 SCR 679
Judges
Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Anglin, Francis Alexander; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe
On appeal from
Canada
Subjects
Aboriginal law
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
The King v. Bonhomme, (1918) 59 S.C.R. 679
Date: 1918-06-10
His Majesty The King v. Bonhomme.
1918: May 28; 1918: June 10.
Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Anglin and Brodeur JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE EXCHEQUER COURT OF CANADA.
Crown grant—Indian lands—Adverse possession.
APPEAL from the judgment of the Exchequer Court of Canada[1], dismissing the action of the plaintiff appellant.
This is an information of intrusion exhibited by the Attorney-General of Canada, whereby it is claimed that the Island of St. Nicholas, situate in navigable waters of the River St. Lawrence, in Lake St. Louis, be declared a portion of the Caughnawaga Indian Reserve and that the possession of the island be given the Indians. On the other hand, the Province of Quebec, claiming the ownership of the island, sold it in 1906 to the respondent.
The Supreme Court of Canada, after argument, reserved judgment and eventually affirmed the judgment of the Exchequer Court.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
F. J. Bisaillon K.C. and P. St. Germain K.C. for the appellant.
F. L. Beique K.C. and N. A. Belcourt K.C. for the respondent.
[1] 16 Ex. C.R. 437; 38 D.L.R. 647.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases