Skip to main content
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal· 2008

Warman v. Northern Alliance

2008 CHRT 6
CharterJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Warman v. Northern Alliance Collection Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Date 2008-03-19 Neutral citation 2008 CHRT 6 File number(s) T1216/2807, T1217/2907 Decision-maker(s) Hadjis, Athanasios Decision type Ruling Decision Content RICHARD WARMAN Complainant - and - CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Commission - and - NORTHERN ALLIANCE AND JASON OUWENDYK Respondents RULING 2008 CHRT 6 2008/03/19 MEMBER: Athanasios D. Hadjis [1] The Commission has moved to obtain an order from the Tribunal that the Respondent Jason Ouwendyk and his agent refrain from using, in written documents filed in this case, language meant to demean the Complainant, the Tribunal, the Commission or any officer of the Court. The Commission also objects to Mr. Ouwendyk's agent in this case, Alexan Kulbashian, using the letters HR instead of the words Human Rights when referring to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in his written pleadings. The Commission seeks an order that the Respondent cease this practice. The Commission also requests that the Respondent's Statement of Particulars and Charter Challenge Witness List, which contain the above references, be rejected and declared expunged from the Tribunal's Record. [2] Section 50(1) of the Act states that the Tribunal must provide parties with the full and ample opportunity, in person or through counsel (avocat or lawyer in the French rendering), to appear at the inquiry, present evidence a…

Read full judgment
Warman v. Northern Alliance
Collection
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Date
2008-03-19
Neutral citation
2008 CHRT 6
File number(s)
T1216/2807, T1217/2907
Decision-maker(s)
Hadjis, Athanasios
Decision type
Ruling
Decision Content
RICHARD WARMAN
Complainant
- and -
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Commission
- and -
NORTHERN ALLIANCE AND JASON OUWENDYK
Respondents
RULING
2008 CHRT 6 2008/03/19
MEMBER: Athanasios D. Hadjis
[1] The Commission has moved to obtain an order from the Tribunal that the Respondent Jason Ouwendyk and his agent refrain from using, in written documents filed in this case, language meant to demean the Complainant, the Tribunal, the Commission or any officer of the Court. The Commission also objects to Mr. Ouwendyk's agent in this case, Alexan Kulbashian, using the letters HR instead of the words Human Rights when referring to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in his written pleadings. The Commission seeks an order that the Respondent cease this practice. The Commission also requests that the Respondent's Statement of Particulars and Charter Challenge Witness List, which contain the above references, be rejected and declared expunged from the Tribunal's Record.
[2] Section 50(1) of the Act states that the Tribunal must provide parties with the full and ample opportunity, in person or through counsel (avocat or lawyer in the French rendering), to appear at the inquiry, present evidence and make representations. It has been the Tribunal's practice, nevertheless, to permit non-lawyer agents of parties to appear as well (see Brown v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police, 2004 CHRT 30 at paras. 86-7; Filgueira v. Garfield Container Transport Inc., 2005 CHRT 27 at para. 16). However, the Tribunal may, at its discretion, limit participation to those agents whom the Tribunal believes will facilitate, rather than hinder, its adjudicative process (Filgueira at para. 15). Accordingly, where an agent of a party behaves in a manner that is offensive or disrespectful towards the other parties or to the Tribunal itself, in my view, the Tribunal is entitled to exercise its discretion to deny the agent permission to represent the party in the proceeding.
[3] In the present case, I note that Mr. Kulbashian has called the Complainant a liar. He appears to refer to the Commission and/or the Tribunal as a thug dressed like a lawyer and to a Tribunal member as a fanatic. Although a party is entitled to question another party's credibility and challenge the legality of the Tribunal's process, this sort of demeaning language is inappropriate and unacceptable in any adjudicative proceeding. The Tribunal hereby advises and directs Mr. Kulbashian not to repeat remarks of this nature in his future dealings with this case, failing which he will no longer be permitted to appear in this proceeding as Mr. Ouwendyk's representative.
[4] As for the Commission's request regarding Mr. Ouwendyk's use of the letters HR, the Tribunal does not find that this matter warrants its intervention. The impugned documents will not be expunged.
Signed by
Athanasios D. Hadjis
OTTAWA, Ontario March 19, 2008
PARTIES OF RECORD
TRIBUNAL FILES:
T1216/2807 and T1217/2907
STYLE OF CAUSE:
Richard Warman v. Northern Alliance and Jason Ouwendyk
RULING OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED:
March 19, 2008
APPEARANCES:
Richard Warman
For himself
Daniel Poulin
For the Canadian Human Rights Commission
No one appearing
For the Respondent Northern Alliance
Alexan Kulbashian
For the Respondent Jason Ouwendyk

Source: decisions.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca

Related cases