Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 2021landmark

References re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act

[2021] 1 SCR 175· 2021 SCC 11
FederalismJDConstitutionalEnvironmentNCA
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail

Federal carbon pricing constitutional under POGG's national-concern branch.

At a glance

The federal Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act is intra vires Parliament under the national-concern branch of the Peace, Order and Good Government (POGG) power. Establishing minimum national standards of GHG price stringency is a matter of national concern.

Material facts

Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Alberta referred the constitutionality of the GGPPA. The Act sets minimum standards and allows provinces to maintain their own equivalent or stricter regimes (backstop).

Issues

Is the Act intra vires Parliament under POGG?

Held

Yes (6-3).

Ratio decidendi

Under POGG's national-concern branch (Crown Zellerbach), a matter is of national concern if (i) it is single, distinct and indivisible, (ii) it has a scale of impact on provincial jurisdiction reconcilable with the division of powers, and (iii) provincial inability — failure of one or more provinces to act would have grave extra-provincial consequences. Establishing minimum national stringency standards for GHG pricing meets the test.

Reasoning

Wagner CJ stressed that climate change is an existential global problem; provincial inaction has serious extra-provincial consequences. The matter is the establishment of minimum national standards, not all aspects of GHG regulation, which keeps the matter narrow enough to satisfy provincial-jurisdiction concerns.

Significance

Most important federalism case in years. Reinvigorates the national-concern branch of POGG. Sets template for federal action on minimum-standard regulation across environmental and other policy areas.

How to cite (McGill 9e)

References re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2021 SCC 11, [2021] 1 SCR 175.

Bench

Wagner CJ, Abella J, Moldaver J, Karakatsanis J, Côté J, Brown J, Rowe J, Martin J, Kasirer J

Source: scc-csc.lexum.com

Related cases