Skip to main content
Tax Court of Canada· 2004

Berthelot v. The Queen

2004 TCC 608
TortJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Berthelot v. The Queen Court (s) Database Tax Court of Canada Judgments Date 2004-09-13 Neutral citation 2004 TCC 608 File numbers 2004-2389(IT)APP Judges and Taxing Officers Alain Tardif Subjects Income Tax Act Decision Content Docket: 2004-2389(IT)APP BETWEEN: MONIQUE BERTHELOT Applicant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. [OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION] ____________________________________________________________________ Application heard on September 1, 2004, at Matane, Quebec. Before: The Honourable Justice Alain Tardif Appearances: For the Applicant: The Applicant herself Counsel for the Respondent: Marie-Claude Landry ____________________________________________________________________ ORDER Upon application to obtain an order for an extension of the time to serve a Notice of Objection to the assessment made pursuant to the Income Tax Act for the 2000 taxation year; And upon the parties' allegations; The application is dismissed in accordance with the attached Reasons for Order. Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 13th day of September 2004. "Alain Tardif" Tardif J. Translation certified true on this 30th day of March 2009. Bella Lewkowicz, Translator Citation: 2004TCC608 Date: 20040913 Docket: 2004-2389(IT)APP BETWEEN: MONIQUE BERTHELOT, Applicant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. [OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION] REASONS FOR ORDER Tardif J. [1] This is an application to obtain an order for an extension the time to serve a Notice of Objection to the assessment made p…

Read full judgment
Berthelot v. The Queen
Court (s) Database
Tax Court of Canada Judgments
Date
2004-09-13
Neutral citation
2004 TCC 608
File numbers
2004-2389(IT)APP
Judges and Taxing Officers
Alain Tardif
Subjects
Income Tax Act
Decision Content
Docket: 2004-2389(IT)APP
BETWEEN:
MONIQUE BERTHELOT
Applicant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
[OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION]
____________________________________________________________________
Application heard on September 1, 2004, at Matane, Quebec.
Before: The Honourable Justice Alain Tardif
Appearances:
For the Applicant:
The Applicant herself
Counsel for the Respondent:
Marie-Claude Landry
____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Upon application to obtain an order for an extension of the time to serve a Notice of Objection to the assessment made pursuant to the Income Tax Act for the 2000 taxation year;
And upon the parties' allegations;
The application is dismissed in accordance with the attached Reasons for Order.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 13th day of September 2004.
"Alain Tardif"
Tardif J.
Translation certified true
on this 30th day of March 2009.
Bella Lewkowicz, Translator
Citation: 2004TCC608
Date: 20040913
Docket: 2004-2389(IT)APP
BETWEEN:
MONIQUE BERTHELOT,
Applicant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
[OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION]
REASONS FOR ORDER
Tardif J.
[1] This is an application to obtain an order for an extension the time to serve a Notice of Objection to the assessment made pursuant to the Income Tax Act (the Act) for the 2000 taxation year.
[2] The Applicant explained that, due to illness, she was unable to file her Notice of Objection for the assessment within the 90-day period provided for in subsection 165(1) of the Act.
[3] She also contended that the reason for her objection was that she did not have to pay income tax on a bursary she received because her employer had guaranteed that the bursary was not taxable.
[4] With respect to the explanations provided for her inability to file the objection, they were unconvincing, all the more so because the procedure and requirements for filing an objection are of tremendously simple and easy.
[5] During this period, Ms. Berthelot took various steps with her employer; she discussed the situation with work colleagues and various representatives in her work group.
[6] The Notice of Assessment was sent July 9, 2002. The 90-day period for objecting to it pursuant to the Act ended on October 7, 2002.
[7] On September 22, 2003, the Applicant submitted an application for an extension of time, more than 11 months after the 90-day deadline had expired.
[8] On January 27, 2004, the application for an extension of time was dismissed. The Applicant still had 90 days to bring an appeal with the Tax Court of Canada, but she submitted her application to the Court May 31, 2004, more than 120 days after the decision.
[9] The reasons and explanations submitted by the Applicant are not valid as they are completely unjustifiable, and even implausible.
[10] Allowing the Applicant’s application would be like rewarding wanton negligence and recklessness.
[11] Parliament enacted very simple provisions and prescribed more than reasonable time limits to ensure all persons can exercise their rights. Certain rules and a certain amount of discipline are required in order to ensure the system works well.
[12] The Applicant's application is dismissed.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 13th day of September 2004.
"Alain Tardif"
Tardif J.
Translation certified true
on this 30th day of March 2009.
Bella Lewkowicz, Translator
CITATION:
2004TCC608
COURT FILE NO.:
2004-2389(IT)APP
STYLE OF CAUSE:
Monique Berthelot and Her Majesty the Queen
PLACE OF HEARING:
Matane, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING:
September 1, 2004
REASONS FOR ORDER BY:
The Honourable Justice Alain Tardif
DATE OF ORDER:
September 13, 2004
APPEARANCES:
For the Applicant:
The Applicant herself
Counsel for the Respondent:
Marie-Claude Landry
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Applicant:
For the Respondent:
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada

Source: decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca

Related cases