Bank of Nova Scotia v. B-Filer Inc.
Court headnote
Bank of Nova Scotia v. B-Filer Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-06-20 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 232 File numbers A-544-05 Decision Content Date: 20060620 Docket: A-544-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 232 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA Appellant and B-FILER INC., B-FILER INC. doing business as GPAY GUARANTEED PAYMENT and NPAY INC. Respondents Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on June 20, 2006. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on June 20, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SEXTON J.A. Date: 20060620 Docket: A-544-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 232 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA Appellant and B-FILER INC., B-FILER INC. doing business as GPAY GUARANTEED PAYMENT and NPAY INC. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on June 20, 2006) SEXTON J.A. [1] Notwithstanding the able argument by Mr. Morrison, we are all of the view this appeal cannot succeed. As pointed out by this Court in the Barcode case (Barcode Systems Inc. v. Symbol Technologies Canada ULC, [2004] F.C.J. No. 1657) at para. 17: ¶ 17 The threshold for an applicant obtaining leave is not a difficult one to meet. It need only provide sufficient credible evidence of what is alleged to give rise to a bona fide belief by the Tribunal. This is a lower standard of proof than proof on a balance of probabilities which will be the standard applicable to the…
Read full judgment
Bank of Nova Scotia v. B-Filer Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-06-20 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 232 File numbers A-544-05 Decision Content Date: 20060620 Docket: A-544-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 232 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA Appellant and B-FILER INC., B-FILER INC. doing business as GPAY GUARANTEED PAYMENT and NPAY INC. Respondents Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on June 20, 2006. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on June 20, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SEXTON J.A. Date: 20060620 Docket: A-544-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 232 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA Appellant and B-FILER INC., B-FILER INC. doing business as GPAY GUARANTEED PAYMENT and NPAY INC. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on June 20, 2006) SEXTON J.A. [1] Notwithstanding the able argument by Mr. Morrison, we are all of the view this appeal cannot succeed. As pointed out by this Court in the Barcode case (Barcode Systems Inc. v. Symbol Technologies Canada ULC, [2004] F.C.J. No. 1657) at para. 17: ¶ 17 The threshold for an applicant obtaining leave is not a difficult one to meet. It need only provide sufficient credible evidence of what is alleged to give rise to a bona fide belief by the Tribunal. This is a lower standard of proof than proof on a balance of probabilities which will be the standard applicable to the decision on the merits. [2] Keeping this in mind, we are all of the view that Simpson J. committed no reviewable error when she concluded that from her analysis that "there is sufficient credible evidence to give rise to a bona fide belief that the elements of section 75 could be satisfied." [3] The appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs. "J. Edgar Sexton" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-544-05 (APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL DATED NOVEMBER 4, 2005) STYLE OF CAUSE: THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA v. B-FILER INC., B-FILER INC. doing business as GPAY GUARANTEED PAYMENT and NPAY INC. PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, ON DATE OF HEARING: June 20, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (NOËL, NADON & SEXTON J.J. A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH: SEXTON J.A. APPEARANCES: F. Paul Morrison Tanya Pagliaroli For the Appellant Michael Osborne Jennifer Cantwell Sharon Dalton For the Respondents SOLICITORS OF RECORD: McCARTHY TÉTRAULT LLP Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, ON For the Appellant AFFLECK GREENE ORR LLP Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, ON For the Respondents
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca