Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2009

Landry v. Canada

2009 FCA 174
EvidenceJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Landry v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2009-05-27 Neutral citation 2009 FCA 174 File numbers A-417-07 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20090527 Docket: A-417-07 Citation: 2009 FCA 174 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: PHILLIP L. LANDRY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 27, 2009. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 27, 2009. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: PELLETIER J.A. Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20090527 Docket: A-417-07 Citation: 2009 FCA 174 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: PHILLIP L. LANDRY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 27, 2009) PELLETIER J.A. [1] In determining whether the allowance received by the appellant with respect to his vehicle expenses was reasonable, the Tax Court judge proceeded on the basis that the appellant’s total vehicle usage in each of the years in question was 72,000 kilometers. The appellant challenges this, arguing that the right number is closer to 53,000 kilometers. [2] At paragraph 12 of his reasons, the Tax Court judge explained that the appellant did not have any “specific documents or information” to support his position as to his total kilometers driven. Accordingly he relied on the calculation prepar…

Read full judgment
Landry v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2009-05-27
Neutral citation
2009 FCA 174
File numbers
A-417-07
Decision Content
Federal Court of Appeal
CANADA
Cour d'appel fédérale
Date: 20090527
Docket: A-417-07
Citation: 2009 FCA 174
CORAM: NADON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
PHILLIP L. LANDRY
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 27, 2009.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 27, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: PELLETIER J.A.
Federal Court of Appeal
CANADA
Cour d'appel fédérale
Date: 20090527
Docket: A-417-07
Citation: 2009 FCA 174
CORAM: NADON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
PHILLIP L. LANDRY
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 27, 2009)
PELLETIER J.A.
[1] In determining whether the allowance received by the appellant with respect to his vehicle expenses was reasonable, the Tax Court judge proceeded on the basis that the appellant’s total vehicle usage in each of the years in question was 72,000 kilometers. The appellant challenges this, arguing that the right number is closer to 53,000 kilometers.
[2] At paragraph 12 of his reasons, the Tax Court judge explained that the appellant did not have any “specific documents or information” to support his position as to his total kilometers driven. Accordingly he relied on the calculation prepared by the appeals officer. The appellant’s attempts to put new evidence of vehicle usage before this Court by way of affidavits were refused. As a result, the appeal is to be decided on the basis of the evidence which was before the Tax Court judge.
[3] Having regard to the record before the Tax Court judge, we cannot identify any error which would justify our intervention.
[4] The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“J.D. Denis Pelletier”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-417-07
APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF MR. JUSTICE WEBB OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA IN FILE NO. 2006-2893(IT)I.
STYLE OF CAUSE: PHILLIP L. LANDRY v.
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF HEARING: May 27, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (NADON, PELLETIER,
TRUDEL JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: PELLETIER J.A.
APPEARANCES:
PHILLIP L. LANDRY
(on his own behalf)
FOR THE APPELLANT
AMY KENDELL
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases