Legori v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court headnote
Legori v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2004-03-03 Neutral citation 2004 FC 316 File numbers IMM-1304-04 Decision Content Date: 20040303 Docket: IMM-1304-04 Citation: 2004 FC 316 Toronto, Ontario, March 3rd, 2004 Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly BETWEEN: PRINCE PHILIP ASEERVATHAM LEGORI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] Mr. Prince Philip Aseervatham Legori has asked me to stay the execution of an order requiring him to leave Canada for his native Sri Lanka on March 4, 2004. He argues that an assessment of the risk he would face on his return to Sri Lanka was faulty. The officer who conducted that assessment, according to Mr. Legori, did not take adequate account of evidence showing that recent events in Sri Lanka expose him, as a Tamil male, to a high risk of mistreatment. [2] Mr. Legori argues that the question whether the officer's approach to the evidence was proper amounts to a serious issue to be tried. Further, he submits that returning him to Sri Lanka now would expose him to irreparable harm. Those arguments, along with his assertion that the balance of convenience lies in permitting him to stay in Canada while pursuing his legal remedies here, he says, satisfy the three-part test for a stay of execution. [3] I am not satisfied that Mr. Legori has presented a serious issue or evidence of irreparable harm. Therefore, I must dis…
Read full judgment
Legori v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2004-03-03 Neutral citation 2004 FC 316 File numbers IMM-1304-04 Decision Content Date: 20040303 Docket: IMM-1304-04 Citation: 2004 FC 316 Toronto, Ontario, March 3rd, 2004 Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly BETWEEN: PRINCE PHILIP ASEERVATHAM LEGORI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] Mr. Prince Philip Aseervatham Legori has asked me to stay the execution of an order requiring him to leave Canada for his native Sri Lanka on March 4, 2004. He argues that an assessment of the risk he would face on his return to Sri Lanka was faulty. The officer who conducted that assessment, according to Mr. Legori, did not take adequate account of evidence showing that recent events in Sri Lanka expose him, as a Tamil male, to a high risk of mistreatment. [2] Mr. Legori argues that the question whether the officer's approach to the evidence was proper amounts to a serious issue to be tried. Further, he submits that returning him to Sri Lanka now would expose him to irreparable harm. Those arguments, along with his assertion that the balance of convenience lies in permitting him to stay in Canada while pursuing his legal remedies here, he says, satisfy the three-part test for a stay of execution. [3] I am not satisfied that Mr. Legori has presented a serious issue or evidence of irreparable harm. Therefore, I must dismiss this motion. [4] Mr. Legori suggests that the officer's decision, dated January 20, 2004, should have included references to evidence of recent developments in Sri Lanka. The documents referred to by the officer were from 2002 and 2003. [5] In any case, the officer had clearly considered all of the submissions made to him and specifically addressed the situation in Sri Lanka after the breakdown of peace talks in the spring of 2003. I cannot see any serious issue arising from the officer's treatment of that evidence. [6] As for irreparable harm, Mr. Legori's submission is speculative. As he states in his affidavit, he fears that "the latest national political crisis will plunge the country into chaos and re-ignite ethnic tensions and the war between the State and LTTE." If that were to transpire, Mr. Legori could, as a Tamil male, be exposed to a heightened risk of personal harm. But this is not the current situation in Sri Lanka. True, recent events are worrisome; they do not appear, however, to give risk to a present and tangible risk to Mr. Legori. Even considering the most up-to-date evidence, I am not satisfied that Mr. Legori's return to Sri Lanka would expose him to irreparable harm. Accordingly, this motion is dismissed. ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that this motion is dismissed. "James W. O'Reilly" J.F.C. FEDERAL COURT Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record DOCKET: IMM-1304-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: PRINCE PHILIP ASEERVATHAM LEGORI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 1, 2004 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER BY: O'REILLY, J. DATED: MARCH 3, 2004 APPEARANCES BY: Mr. Robert I. Blanshay FOR THE APPLICANT Ms. Marina Stefanovic FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Robert I. Blanshay Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT FEDERAL COURT Date: 20040303 Docket: IMM-1304-04 BETWEEN: PRINCE PHILIP ASEERVATHAM LEGORI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca