Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Canada (Health)
Source text
Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Canada (Health) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2007-06-18 Neutral citation 2007 FC 650 File numbers T-1232-05 Decision Content Date: 20070618 Docket: T-1232-05 Citation: 2007 FC 650 Ottawa, Ontario, June 18, 2007 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan BETWEEN: PFIZER CANADA INC. Applicant and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH and APOTEX INC. Respondents and SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GmbH Respondent/Patentee SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS TO AMENDED ORDER [1] At the hearing of this NOC application (an application for an order of prohibition), the Court was asked to provide advance notice to counsel of the timing of its decision. [2] Subsequent to the NOC hearing, the Respondent brought a motion to dismiss the NOC application, that motion was to be heard on Monday, June 18, 2007. The motion would be redundant if the Court decided to dismiss the Applicant’s NOC application. To accommodate counsel and to prevent an unnecessary hearing, the Court advised counsel on Wednesday, June 13, 2007, that it had decided to dismiss the Applicant’s application and anticipated releasing its reasons shortly. Counsel were asked to inform the Court as to their position regarding the motion to dismiss. [3] The formal Order and Reasons were released on Friday, June 15, 2007, despite the Applicant filing a Notice of Discontinuance the day before. [4] The Court’s Order dismissing the application was dated June 15, 2007, despite having been disclosed on June 13, 2007. This was a…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Canada (Health) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2007-06-18 Neutral citation 2007 FC 650 File numbers T-1232-05 Decision Content Date: 20070618 Docket: T-1232-05 Citation: 2007 FC 650 Ottawa, Ontario, June 18, 2007 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan BETWEEN: PFIZER CANADA INC. Applicant and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH and APOTEX INC. Respondents and SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GmbH Respondent/Patentee SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS TO AMENDED ORDER [1] At the hearing of this NOC application (an application for an order of prohibition), the Court was asked to provide advance notice to counsel of the timing of its decision. [2] Subsequent to the NOC hearing, the Respondent brought a motion to dismiss the NOC application, that motion was to be heard on Monday, June 18, 2007. The motion would be redundant if the Court decided to dismiss the Applicant’s NOC application. To accommodate counsel and to prevent an unnecessary hearing, the Court advised counsel on Wednesday, June 13, 2007, that it had decided to dismiss the Applicant’s application and anticipated releasing its reasons shortly. Counsel were asked to inform the Court as to their position regarding the motion to dismiss. [3] The formal Order and Reasons were released on Friday, June 15, 2007, despite the Applicant filing a Notice of Discontinuance the day before. [4] The Court’s Order dismissing the application was dated June 15, 2007, despite having been disclosed on June 13, 2007. This was a clerical error as the Order should have been dated June 13, 2007, when counsel were informed of the Court’s disposition. The situation is analogous to an oral judgment (see Baxter Travenol Laboratories of Canada Ltd. v. Cutter (Canada) Ltd., [1983] 2 S.C.R. 388). [5] Pursuant to Rule 397(2), the Order dismissing the Applicant’s application for a prohibition order will be amended to be effective as of June 13, 2007. “Michael L. Phelan” Judge FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1232-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: PFIZER CANADA INC. and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH et al PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: April 23 and 24, 2007 SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS TO AMENDED ORDER: Phelan J. DATED: June 18, 2007 APPEARANCES: Mr. Peter R. Wilcox Mr. Andrew Bernstein Ms. Alisse Houweling FOR THE APPLICANT Mr. Andrew R. Brodkin Mr. John H. Simpson FOR THE RESPONDENT, APOTEX INC. Mr. J. Sheldon Hamilton FOR THE RESPONDENT/PATENTEE SOLICITORS OF RECORD: TORYS LLP Barristers & Solicitors Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT MR. JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT, THE MINISTER OF HEALTH GOODMANS LLP Barristers & Solicitors Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT, APOTEX INC. SMART & BIGGAR Barristers & Solicitors Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT/PATENTEE
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca