Evidence
Hearsay and Expert Evidence
Khelawon and Mohan.
Two evidentiary frameworks anchor Canadian trial law. Mohan (1994) governs admissibility of expert evidence: relevance, necessity, no exclusionary rule, properly qualified expert — refined by White Burgess (2015) which makes impartiality a precondition. Khelawon (2006) governs hearsay: necessity and threshold reliability (procedural and/or substantive), with ultimate reliability for the trier of fact.
Key principles
- Mohan four-part testRelevance; necessity; no exclusionary rule; qualified expert.
- Threshold reliabilityProcedural reliability + substantive reliability — interactive.
- Trial-judge gatekeeperProbative value vs prejudicial effect on admissibility.
Cases (12)
Kerr v. Baranow
landmark2011 SCC 10
Supreme Court of Canada· 2011· Evidence
Saskatchewan River Bungalows Ltd. v. Maritime Life Assurance Co.
landmark[1994] 2 SCR 490
Supreme Court of Canada· 1994· Evidence
2474234 Ontario Inc. v. Dunn's Famous International Holdings Inc.
2024 FCA 161
Federal Court of Appeal· 2024· Evidence
51.CA Inc v. Chun Huang
2024 FC 1202
Federal Court· 2024· Evidence
Abiola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
2024 FC 724
Federal Court· 2024· Evidence
Adeia Guides Inc. v. BCE Inc.
2024 FC 1471
Federal Court· 2024· Evidence
Agi Suretrack LLC v. Farmers Edge Inc.
2024 FC 934
Federal Court· 2024· Evidence
Ahmadi v. The King
2024 TCC 17
Tax Court of Canada· 2024· Evidence
Aiad v. Office of the Independent Police Review Director
2024 FC 1841
Federal Court· 2024· Evidence
Al-Lamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
2024 FC 1621
Federal Court· 2024· Evidence
Ali v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship)
2024 FC 63
Federal Court· 2024· Evidence
Anderson v. The King
2024 TCC 72
Tax Court of Canada· 2024· Evidence