Skip to main content
Tort

Duty of Care: Anns/Cooper Framework

Foreseeability, proximity, residual policy.

Cooper v Hobart (2001) sets the modern Canadian framework for novel duties of care. Stage 1 asks whether harm was reasonably foreseeable and whether the parties were in a relationship of sufficient proximity. Stage 2 asks whether residual policy concerns negate the prima facie duty.

Hill v Hamilton-Wentworth (2007) applies the framework to recognise the tort of negligent investigation. Childs v Desormeaux (2006) refuses to extend social-host liability. Mustapha v Culligan (2008) clarifies the foreseeability threshold for psychiatric injury.

Key principles

  • Stage 1 foreseeability + proximity
    Including expectations, representations, reliance, statutory framework.
  • Stage 2 residual policy
    Indeterminate liability; conflict with statutory duty.
  • Ordinary fortitude
    Threshold question for psychiatric injury foreseeability.

Cases (4)