Administrative
Standard of Review
Vavilov reasonableness, Baker fairness.
Vavilov (2019) restated the framework for Canadian standard-of-review analysis. Reasonableness is the presumptive standard for review of administrative decisions. Correctness applies in five categories: legislative direction, statutory rights of appeal, constitutional questions, general questions of law of central importance, and jurisdictional boundaries between bodies.
Baker (1999) governs procedural fairness — the five Baker factors set the content of fairness. Roncarelli (1959) anchors all of administrative law in the rule of law: there is no such thing as absolute discretion.
Key principles
- Reasonableness presumedRebutted only in five Vavilov correctness categories.
- Reasoned-decision requirementReview actual reasons; do not hypothesise.
- Baker fairness factorsDecision-nature; statutory scheme; importance; expectations; agency's procedural choices.
- Rule of lawDiscretion is bounded by statutory purpose and good faith (Roncarelli).
Cases (4)
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov
landmark[2019] 4 SCR 653
Supreme Court of Canada· 2019· Administrative
Dunsmuir v New Brunswick
landmark[2008] 1 SCR 190
Supreme Court of Canada· 2008· Administrative
Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
landmark[1999] 2 SCR 817
Supreme Court of Canada· 1999· Administrative
Roncarelli v Duplessis
landmark[1959] SCR 121
Supreme Court of Canada· 1959· Administrative