Skip to main content
Administrative

Standard of Review

Vavilov reasonableness, Baker fairness.

Vavilov (2019) restated the framework for Canadian standard-of-review analysis. Reasonableness is the presumptive standard for review of administrative decisions. Correctness applies in five categories: legislative direction, statutory rights of appeal, constitutional questions, general questions of law of central importance, and jurisdictional boundaries between bodies.

Baker (1999) governs procedural fairness — the five Baker factors set the content of fairness. Roncarelli (1959) anchors all of administrative law in the rule of law: there is no such thing as absolute discretion.

Key principles

  • Reasonableness presumed
    Rebutted only in five Vavilov correctness categories.
  • Reasoned-decision requirement
    Review actual reasons; do not hypothesise.
  • Baker fairness factors
    Decision-nature; statutory scheme; importance; expectations; agency's procedural choices.
  • Rule of law
    Discretion is bounded by statutory purpose and good faith (Roncarelli).

Cases (4)