Moll v. The Queen

Moll v. The Queen
Court (s) Database
Tax Court of Canada Judgments
Date
2011-09-15
Neutral citation
2011 TCC 432
File numbers
2011-924(IT)G
Judges and Taxing Officers
Wyman W. Webb
Subjects
Income Tax Act
Decision Content
Docket: 2011-924(IT)G
BETWEEN:
IRENE MOLL,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
____________________________________________________________________
Motion dealt with by Written Representations
Before: The Honourable Justice Wyman W. Webb
For the Appellant:
The Appellant Herself
Counsel for the Respondent:
Margaret Irving
Donna Tomljanovic
____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Upon motion by the Appellant for an Order entitling Lino Mastromonaco to represent the Appellant in this appeal;
And upon reading the submissions made by the parties;
The Motion is dismissed, with costs payable forthwith in any event of the cause.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 15th day of September 2011.
“Wyman W. Webb”
Webb J.
Citation: 2011TCC432
Date: 20110915
Docket: 2011-924(IT)G
BETWEEN:
IRENE MOLL,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
REASONS FOR ORDER
Webb J.
[1] The Appellant brought a Motion to request that Lino Mastromonaco, who is not a lawyer, be permitted to represent the Appellant in her appeal. Subsection 30(1) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure) ("Rules") provides as follows:
30. (1) Subject to subsection (3), a party to a proceeding who is an individual may act in person or be represented by counsel.
[2] The Appellant submits that compliance with this provision of the Rules should be waived in this case because the Appellant is required to use a hearing aid to assist her hearing and as a result she is unable, from time to time, to fully understand or hear telephone conversations. Paragraph 9 of the Rules provides that:
9. The Court may, where and as necessary in the interests of justice, dispense with compliance with any rule at any time.
[3] However, section 17.1 of the Tax Court of Canada Act provides that:
17.1 (1) A party to a proceeding in respect of which this section applies may appear in person or be represented by counsel, but where the party wishes to be represented by counsel, only a person who is referred to in subsection (2) shall represent the party.
(2) Every person who may practise as a barrister, advocate, attorney or solicitor in any of the provinces may so practise in the Court and is an officer of the Court.
[4] While paragraph 9 of the Rules allows the Court to dispense with compliance with any rule, it does not allow a Court to dispense with the requirements of the Tax Court of Canada Act nor can this court change this Act. Section 17.1 of the Tax Court of Canada Act is clear and the Appellant may either appear in person or be represented by counsel. Since Lino Mastromonaco is not a person referred to in subsection 17.1(2) of the Tax Court of Canada Act, he cannot represent the Appellant in this Appeal.
[5] The motion by the Appellant for an Order entitling Lino Mastromonaco to represent the Appellant in this Appeal is dismissed with costs payable forthwith in any event of the cause.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 15th day of September 2011.
“Wyman W. Webb”
Webb J.
CITATION: 2011TCC432
COURT FILE NO.: 2011-924(IT)G
STYLE OF CAUSE: IRENE MOLL AND
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
DATE OF HEARING:
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: The Honourable Justice Wyman W. Webb
DATE OF ORDER: September 15, 2011
For the Appellant:
The Appellant Herself
Counsel for the Respondent:
Margaret Irving
Donna Tomljanovic
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellant:
Name:
Firm:
For the Respondent: Myles J. Kirvan
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada