Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1979landmark

AG (Quebec) v Blaikie

[1979] 2 SCR 1016· 1979 CanLII 21 (SCC)
ConstitutionalJDConstitutionalLanguageNCA
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail

Section 133 of the Constitution Act 1867 requires Quebec's Charter of the French Language to provide for English-language legislation and judicial proceedings.

At a glance

Blaikie struck down provisions of Quebec's Bill 101 (Charter of the French Language) requiring exclusive French in legislation and judicial proceedings. Section 133 of the Constitution Act 1867 entrenches both English and French in the Quebec legislature and courts.

Material facts

Quebec's Bill 101 (1977) made French the exclusive language of provincial legislation, regulations, and judicial proceedings. Blaikie and others challenged.

Issues

Does s.133 require bilingual provincial legislation and judicial proceedings in Quebec?

Held

Yes. Provisions struck.

Ratio decidendi

Section 133 of the Constitution Act 1867 entrenches the use of both English and French in the Quebec legislature, in the Records and Journals of the legislature, and in pleadings and processes in Quebec courts. The provincial legislature cannot abrogate this entrenchment by ordinary statute.

Reasoning

The Court read s.133 in light of its constitutional status as part of Confederation. Statutory unilingualism would gut the constitutional entrenchment. Bill 101 had to be amended.

Significance

Foundational language-rights case. Together with the Manitoba Language Reference (1985), defines the constitutional architecture of legislative bilingualism.

How to cite (McGill 9e)

AG (Quebec) v Blaikie, [1979] 2 SCR 1016, 1979 CanLII 21 (SCC).

Bench

Laskin CJ, Martland J, Ritchie J, Pigeon J, Dickson J, Beetz J, Estey J, Pratte J, McIntyre J

Source: scc-csc.lexum.com

Related cases