Skip to main content

Landmark Land cases

Foundational UK land law authorities — easements, covenants, leases, adverse possession — ordered by citation impact.

50 landmarks, ordered by citation impact.

  1. 01

    Lloyds Bank v Rosset

    [1991] 1 AC 107 · House of Lords · 1991

    House of Lords sets strict test for claiming beneficial interest in property

  2. 02

    Lace v Chantler

    [1944] KB 368 · Court of Appeal · 1944

    Lease terms must be certain in duration to create valid leases.

  3. 03

    Burns v Burns

    [1984] Ch 317 · Court of Appeal · 1984

    Cohabiting partner denied property share despite 19-year relationship and domestic contributions

  4. 04

    Rhone v Stephens

    [1994] 2 AC 310 · House of Lords · 1994

    House of Lords confirms positive covenants cannot bind successor landowners

  5. 05

    Mexfield Housing Co-operative v Berrisford

    [2011] UKSC 52 · Supreme Court · 2011

    Uncertain terms granted to individuals take effect as 90-year tenancies under s.149(6) LPA 1925.

  6. 06

    Tulk v Moxhay

    (1848) 2 Ph 774 · Court of Chancery · 1848

    Restrictive covenants can bind future landowners in equity despite lack of privity

  7. 07

    Williams v Hensman

    (1861) 1 J & H 546 · Court of Chancery · 1861

    Joint tenancy can be severed by act of party, mutual agreement, or course of dealing.

  8. 08

    Dillwyn v Llewelyn

    (1862) 4 De GF & J 517 · Chancery · 1862

    Imperfect gift of land perfected by donee's detrimental reliance and improvements

  9. 09

    Hill v Tupper

    (1863) 2 H & C 121 · Court of Exchequer · 1863

    Easements must benefit land itself, not just provide personal commercial advantage

  10. 10

    Moody v Steggles

    (1879) 12 Ch D 261 · Chancery Division · 1879

    Easements can exist for commercial purposes, including advertising signs on neighbouring property.

  11. 11

    Wheeldon v Burrows

    (1879) 12 Ch D 31 · Court of Appeal · 1879

    Implied easements automatically pass when landowner sells part of property

  12. 12

    Walsh v Lonsdale

    (1882) 21 Ch D 9 · Court of Appeal · 1882

    Equity treats valid lease agreements as if leases already granted

  13. 13

    Austerberry v Oldham Corporation

    (1885) 29 Ch D 750 · Court of Appeal · 1885

    Burden of positive covenants cannot run with freehold land at law or equity

  14. 14

    London County Council v Allen

    [1914] 3 KB 642 · Court of Appeal · 1914

    Burden of restrictive covenant cannot run to bind third parties not original covenantor

  15. 15

    Knightsbridge Estates Trust v Byrne

    [1939] Ch 441 · 1939

    A mortgage term postponing redemption is valid if not oppressive or unconscionable

  16. 16

    Wright v Macadam

    [1949] 2 KB 744 · Court of Appeal · 1949

    Easements can be created by implied grant following landlord's permission to tenant.

  17. 17

    Copeland v Greenhalf

    [1952] Ch 488 · Chancery Division · 1952

    Court rejects easement claim for vehicle storage as too extensive

  18. 18

    Re Ellenborough Park

    [1956] Ch 131 · Court of Appeal · 1956

    Court of Appeal establishes four essential characteristics test for easements

  19. 19

    Bridges v Mees

    [1957] Ch 475 · 1957

    A tenant cannot disclaim part of demised premises while retaining the remainder.

  20. 20

    Halsall v Brizell

    [1957] Ch 169 · Chancery Division · 1957

    Cannot take benefit of deed without accepting corresponding burdens - mutual benefit and burden

  21. 21

    Wong v Beaumont Property Trust

    [1965] 1 QB 173 · Court of Appeal · 1965

    Easements can be implied by necessity for reasonable enjoyment of property.

  22. 22

    National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth

    [1965] AC 1175 · House of Lords · 1965

    Property rights require definiteness, identifiability, and third-party enforceability to constitute proprietary interests.

  23. 23

    Inwards v Baker

    [1965] 2 QB 29 · Court of Appeal · 1965

    Son who built on father's land acquired equitable interest through proprietary estoppel

  24. 24

    Mortgage — Cityland and Property (Holdings) Ltd v Dabrah

    [1968] Ch 166 · Chancery Division · 1968

    Courts can strike down unconscionable mortgage terms beyond traditional penalty clauses

  25. 25

    Pettitt v Pettitt

    [1970] AC 777 · House of Lords · 1970

    Matrimonial property governed by ordinary property law, not special family asset doctrine

  26. 26

    Gissing v Gissing

    [1971] AC 886 · House of Lords · 1971

    Beneficial interests in family homes require financial contributions or clear common intention

  27. 27

    Prescription — Tehidy Minerals Ltd v Norman

    [1971] 2 QB 528 · Court of Appeal · 1971

    Easements acquired by prescription require use 'as of right' not actual right

  28. 28

    Cuckmere Brick v Mutual Finance

    [1971] Ch 949 · Court of Appeal · 1971

    Mortgagees must take reasonable care to obtain proper market value when selling

  29. 29

    Crabb v Arun DC

    [1976] Ch 179 · Court of Appeal · 1976

    Proprietary estoppel creates enforceable rights where assurance induces detrimental reliance on property

  30. 30

    Powell v McFarlane

    (1977) 38 P & CR 452 · Chancery Division · 1977

    Adverse possession requires both factual possession and clear intention to possess land.

  31. 31

    Proprietary Estoppel — Pascoe v Turner

    [1979] 1 WLR 431 · Court of Appeal · 1979

    Proprietary estoppel can grant full ownership where reliance and detriment are sufficiently substantial.

  32. 32

    Restrictive Covenants — Federated Homes Ltd v Mill Lodge Properties Ltd

    [1980] 1 WLR 594 · Court of Appeal · 1980

    Section 78 LPA 1925 automatically annexes covenant benefits to land

  33. 33

    Williams & Glyn's Bank v Boland

    [1981] AC 487 · House of Lords · 1981

    Wife's home rights trump bank's mortgage despite husband's sole legal ownership

  34. 34

    Bristol & West Building Society v Henning

    [1985] 1 WLR 778 · 1985

    Mortgagee must give reasonable notice before sale of mortgaged property

  35. 35

    Street v Mountford

    [1985] AC 809 · House of Lords · 1985

    House of Lords creates definitive test for lease versus licence distinction

  36. 36

    Paddington Building Society v Mendelsohn

    (1985) 50 P&CR 244 · 1985

    Inquiry notice does not arise from mere occupation where occupier's equitable interest is consistent with mortgage

  37. 37

    Goodman v Gallant

    [1986] Fam 106 · Court of Appeal · 1986

    Express joint tenancy declaration cannot be severed by conduct alone without written evidence.

  38. 38

    City of London BS v Flegg

    [1988] AC 54 · House of Lords · 1988

    Beneficiaries' occupation rights cannot override trustees' statutory sale powers

  39. 39

    Licence — Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold

    [1989] Ch 1 · Court of Appeal · 1989

    Contractual licences are generally personal rights that cannot bind third party purchasers of land.

  40. 40

    Aslan v Murphy

    [1990] 1 WLR 766 · Court of Appeal · 1990

    Courts will disregard artificial contractual terms that do not reflect the reality of occupation.

  41. 41

    Buckinghamshire CC v Moran

    [1990] Ch 623 · Court of Appeal · 1990

    Adverse possession can succeed even when possessor knows they lack legal right.

  42. 42

    Antoniades v Villiers

    [1990] 1 AC 417 · House of Lords · 1990

    House of Lords pierces sham separate agreements to find joint tenancy

  43. 43

    Re Citro

    [1991] Ch 142 · Court of Appeal · 1991

    Children's interests relevant but don't trump creditors' rights in family home sales

  44. 44

    Abbey National v Cann

    [1991] 1 AC 56 · House of Lords · 1991

    House of Lords rules no gap in time between property purchase and mortgage creation

  45. 45

    Hammersmith LBC v Monk

    [1992] 1 AC 478 · House of Lords · 1992

    One joint tenant can end periodic tenancy without other's consent

  46. 46

    Prudential Assurance v London Residuary Body

    [1992] 2 AC 386 · House of Lords · 1992

    House of Lords rules leases must have certain duration to be valid

  47. 47

    Palk v Mortgage Services Funding

    [1993] Ch 330 · Court of Appeal · 1993

    Mortgagee must obtain true market value but needn't delay for best possible price

  48. 48

    Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Norgan

    [1996] 1 WLR 343 · Court of Appeal · 1996

    Courts should consider entire mortgage term when granting possession adjournments to mortgagors

  49. 49

    Lloyds Bank v Carrick

    [1996] 4 All ER 630 · Court of Appeal · 1996

    Contractual purchasers in actual occupation can claim overriding interests under Land Registration Act 1925.

  50. 50

    Sledmore v Dalby

    (1996) 72 P&CR 196 · 1996

    Proprietary estoppel may fail where equity has been satisfied by acquiescence