Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Smith v. Allwright, Election Judge, et al., 1944 — 322 U.S. 718 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Smith v. Allwright, Election Judge, et al.
322 U.S. 718·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration of the order here entered.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 51.
Smith v. Allwright, Election Judge, et al.
June 12, 1944.
[MAJORITY]
The sentence on page 9 of the slip opinion which reads:
“Under our Constitution, the great privilege of choosing his rulers may not be denied a man by the State because of his color,” is amended to read as follows:
“Under our Constitution the great privilege of the ballot may not be denied a man by the State because of his color.”
Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration of the order here entered.