UK Case Law Intelligence
Search UK law like
you think
Type any legal question. Get a full case brief with citations in under 2 seconds — built for UK law students.
No credit card required
412K+
Judgments indexed
<2s
Brief generation
98.4%
Citation accuracy
Trusted by students at
See it in action
Platform at a glance
Built for depth, not decoration
412,847
Judgments indexed from BAILII, UKSC & tribunals
1.8s
Average brief generation time
98.4%
Citation accuracy across all indexed judgments
Latest Judgments
R v Smith [2025] UKSC 12
Joint enterprise liability reframed under the complicity doctrine
AB v Secretary of State [2025] UKSC 8
Deportation orders subject to enhanced procedural review
Thornton v NHS Trust [2024] EWCA 892
Material contribution test applied to clinical negligence
AI Brief Generator
Plain-English summaries with ratio decidendi, obiter dicta, and key holdings extracted automatically.
Spaced Repetition Flashcards
19 modules covering every UK law subject. 3D card flip, SM-2 algorithm, progress tracking across sessions.
Citation Tracker
See how judgments cite, distinguish, and overrule each other across decades of case law.
No credit card required
Browse by area
Legal categories
Contract
48,230 cases
Leading case
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co
Tort
62,105 cases
Leading case
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]
Criminal
89,412 cases
Leading case
R v Woollin [1999]
Public Law
31,847 cases
Leading case
Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury
Equity & Trusts
27,603 cases
Leading case
Keech v Sandford [1726]
EU & Human Rights
19,234 cases
Leading case
Factortame (No 2) [1991]
Land Law
34,891 cases
Leading case
Williams & Glyn's Bank v Boland
Employment
41,062 cases
Leading case
Autoclenz v Belcher [2011]
Join free today
AI-generated briefs
From judgment
to understanding
Every brief extracts the ratio, obiter dicta, material facts, and subsequent treatment — structured for revision, not just reading.
Case
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
Court
House of Lords
Ratio Decidendi
A manufacturer of products owes a duty of care to the ultimate consumer where the goods reach the consumer in the form in which they left the manufacturer, with no reasonable possibility of intermediate examination.
Key Principle
The "neighbour principle" — you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour.
Subsequent Treatment
→ Applied in Caparo v Dickman [1990] — three-part test
→ Distinguished in Murphy v Brentwood [1991] — pure economic loss
→ Considered in Robinson v Chief Constable [2018] — police duty
Citation intelligence
See how cases connect
Interactive citation maps reveal how precedents cite, distinguish, and overrule each other — so you never miss a critical link.
Student reviews
What students are saying
Replaced my entire Westlaw subscription for a tenth of the price. Got a First in Contract law last semester.
Jamie L.
UCL LLB, Year 2
The AI briefs save me hours every week. I use it daily for SQE prep — nothing else comes close.
Priya S.
BPP Law School, LPC/SQE
Citation mapping is genuinely brilliant. Found three cases I'd completely missed in my dissertation.
Tom H.
Oxford BCL
Start in 30 seconds
Start searching
Free plan available. No credit card required.