Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eugene A. Johnson, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant, 1899 — 161 N.Y. 618 · caselaw · US
General
Eugene A. Johnson, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
161 N.Y. 618·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eugene A. Johnson, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Submitted November 20, 1899;
decided November 28, 1899.)
Motion to open default, by reason of which appeal was dismissed for failure to tile return.
The appeal which was dismissed was taken from an interlocutory judgment of the Appellate Division,-containing leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, but not certifying any question for review. The order was subsequently resettled, questions were formulated, and since then another appeal has been taken.
William J. Kelly for motion.
Scott & Treadwell opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the last appeal only is regular. (160 N, Y. 312.)