Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Buck et al. v. Gallagher et al., 1938 — 305 U.S. 569 · caselaw · US
General
Buck et al. v. Gallagher et al.
305 U.S. 569·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 329.
Buck et al. v. Gallagher et al.
November 7, 1938.
Messrs. Thomas G. Haight, Louis D. Frohlich, and Herman Finkelstein for appellants.
Messrs. G. W. Hamilton, Attorney General of Washington, John Egan Belcher, Assistant Attorney General, Edwin C. Ewing, Ralph E. Foley; Sam M. Driver, and Alfred J. Schweppe for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Washington.
Motion to dismiss the appeal granted as to Ernest N. Hutchinson, John D. Evans, and Sam M. Driver, and the appeal is dismissed as to those three appellees. In all other respects the motion is denied.