General
Blumenthal v. United States; Goldsmith v. United States; Weiss v. United States; and Feigenbaum v. United States
331 U.S. 799·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1162.
No. 1163.
No. 1164.
No. 1165.
Blumenthal v. United States; Goldsmith v. United States; Weiss v. United States; and Feigenbaum v. United States.
May 5, 1947.
Hugh K. McKevitt for petitioner in No. 1162. Walter H. Duane and Arthur B. Dunne for petitioner in No. 1163. Petitioner pro se in No. 1164. Leo R. Friedman for petitioner in No. 1165. Acting Solicitor General Washington, William E. Remy, David London, Samuel Mermin and Norma G. Zarky for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
The petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit are granted.
Reported below: 158 F. 2d 762, 883.