General
William S. Pearsall, Individually and as Administrator of Samuel J. Pearsall, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. James H. Westcott et al., Respondents
173 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William S. Pearsall, Individually and as Administrator of Samuel J. Pearsall, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. James H. Westcott et al., Respondents.
Pearsall v. Westcott, 57 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
(Argued November 26, 1902;
decided December 16, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 28, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
C. H. Sturges for appellants.
Edgar T. Brackett for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werneb, JJ.