Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Heslan et al., Appellants, v. William W. Fowler et al., Respondents, 1892 — 131 N.Y. 568 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas Heslan et al., Appellants, v. William W. Fowler et al., Respondents
131 N.Y. 568·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Heslan et al., Appellants, v. William W. Fowler et al., Respondents.
(Argued January 20, 1892;
decided February 2, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made September 8, 1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee appointed to ascertain and report the damages sustained by defendants by reason of an injunction.
James Coupe for appellants.
S. J. Barrows for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Maynaed, J., taking no part.
Order affirmed.