Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pippin v. Nierstheimer, Warden, 1949 — 337 U.S. 942 · caselaw · US
General
Pippin v. Nierstheimer, Warden
337 U.S. 942·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 302, Misc.
Pippin v. Nierstheimer, Warden.
Petitioner pro se.
Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois is denied without prejudice to the filing of an application for writ of habeas corpus in any State court of competent jurisdiction. See Young v. Ragen, 337 U. S. 235.