Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New Britain National Bank, Appellant, v. A. B. Cleveland Company (Limited) et al., Respondents, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 722 · caselaw · US
General
New Britain National Bank, Appellant, v. A. B. Cleveland Company (Limited) et al., Respondents
158 N.Y. 722·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
New Britain National Bank, Appellant, v. A. B. Cleveland Company (Limited) et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 2, 1899;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 15, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
New Britain Nat. Bank v. Cleveland Co., 91 Hun, 447, affirmed.
G. Bainbridge Smith for appellant.
James Dwnne and II. Arlington for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.