Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Fallon, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn City, Hunter's Point and Prospect Park Railroad Company, Respondent, 1874 — 56 N.Y. 652 · caselaw · US
General
William Fallon, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn City, Hunter's Point and Prospect Park Railroad Company, Respondent
56 N.Y. 652·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Fallon, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn City, Hunter’s Point and Prospect Park Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued April 6, 1874;
decided April 14, 1874.)
An order of General Term affirming an order of the court at circuit granting a motion, made on the judge’s minutes, to set aside a verdict as against evidence, is not appealable to this court.
This was an appeal from an order of General Term, affirming an order of the court at circuit granting a motion, made on the minutes of the judge, to set aside a verdict. The motion was granted, as appears by the order, on the ground that the verdict was against evidence. Held, as above.
E. G. Sanderson for the appellant.
John H. Bergen for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
opinion for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.