Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Beaver River Lumber Company, Respondent, v. St. Regis Leather Company et al., Appellants, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 564 · caselaw · US
General
The Beaver River Lumber Company, Respondent, v. St. Regis Leather Company et al., Appellants
170 N.Y. 564·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Beaver River Lumber Company, Respondent, v. St. Regis Leather Company et al., Appellants.
Beaver Biver Lumber Go. v. St. Regis Leather Go., 53 App. Div. 649, affirmed.
(Argued January 23, 1902;
decided February 11, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 31, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Challes E. Snyder for appellants.
Elon P. Brown for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.'
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.