Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General Drivers, Warehousemen, and Helpers, Local Union No. 89, et al. v. American Tobacco Co., Inc., 1955 — 348 U.S. 978 · caselaw · US
General
General Drivers, Warehousemen, and Helpers, Local Union No. 89, et al. v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.
348 U.S. 97899 L. Ed. 2d 762·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 4, 1955.
No. 186.
General Drivers, Warehousemen, and Helpers, Local Union No. 89, et al. v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.
Argued March 31-April 1, 1955.
Decided April 4, 1955.
Herbert S. Thatcher and William S. Tyson argued the cause for petitioners.
J. Albert Woll, David Previant and Ralph H. Logan were with Mr. Thatcher on the brief.
By special leave of Court, Dominick L. Manoli argued the cause for the National Labor Relations Board, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.
With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, David P. Findling and Norton J. Come.
Nelson Helm argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Francis E. Koch.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 813, to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is reversed. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 348 U. S. 468; Bus Employees v. Wisconsin Board, 340 U. S. 383.