Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Retail Clerks Union Local 324 et al. v. Yankwich, U. S. District Judge, 1961 — 368 U.S. 807 · caselaw · US
General
Retail Clerks Union Local 324 et al. v. Yankwich, U. S. District Judge
368 U.S. 807·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 90,
Misc.
Retail Clerks Union Local 324 et al. v. Yankwich, U. S. District Judge.
Robert W. Gilbert, Louis A. Nissen, Jerome Smith and S. G. Lipp-man for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Roth-man, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the National Labor Relations Board, and George R. Richter for Barker Bros. Corp. et al., in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Reported below:-F. Supp.-.