Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
August Reiser et al., Appellants, v. Edward C. Shafer, Respondent, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 579 · caselaw · US
General
August Reiser et al., Appellants, v. Edward C. Shafer, Respondent
177 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
August Reiser et al., Appellants, v. Edward C. Shafer, Respondent.
Keiser v. Shafer, 75 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
(Argued January 27, 1904;
decided February 16,1904.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered November 15, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fojirth judicial department, overruling plaintiffs’ exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for the defendant.
Moses Shire and Edward L. Jellvneh for appellants.
Charles Diebold, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.