General

George H. McPherren, Appellant, v. Charles M. Homan et al., Respondents

158 N.Y. 690·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY

All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

George H. McPherren, Appellant, v. Charles M. Homan et al., Respondents. (Submitted January 25, 1899; decided February 28, 1899.) Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March' 11, 1896, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granting a new trial. McPherren v. Homan, 2 App. Div. 264, appeal dismissed. Nathaniel A. Prentiss for appellant. Samuel Cohn for respondents. [MAJORITY] Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the authority of Henavie v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (154 N. Y. 278). All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.