Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David A. Collier et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. G. Smaltz and Iowa Railroad Land Company, 1911 — 223 U.S. 710 · caselaw · US
General
David A. Collier et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. G. Smaltz and Iowa Railroad Land Company
223 U.S. 710·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 571.
David A. Collier et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. G. Smaltz and Iowa Railroad Land Company.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 23, 1911.
Decided October 30, 1911.
Mr. F. T. Hughes for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. T. M. Zink for J. G. Smaltz, and Mr. Charles A. Clark for the Iowa Railroad Land Company.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 288, and cases cited; Turner v. New York, 168 U. S. 90; Terry v. Anderson, 95 U. S. 628.