Corporations
Charles H. MEARS, Plaintiff, v. J. M. GIDDING & CO., Inc., Defendant, and Jessie Farquharson and Margaret Wheelock, Appellants
7 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles H. MEARS, Plaintiff, v. J. M. GIDDING & CO., Inc., Defendant, and Jessie Farquharson and Margaret Wheelock, Appellants.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 1, 1925.)
No. 374.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Appeal from final order in Equity entered in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, of New York City (Louis Connick and Fred Bielaski, both of New York City, óf counsel), for appellants. Rosenberg & Ball, of New York City (Godfrey Goldmark and Ralph F. Colin, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before, HOUGH and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
There is no difference in legal effect between this case and that of Heineman, etc., Corporation v. Nat Levy & Co., 6 F.(2d) 970, opinion filed in this court April 6, 1925. On the authority of that case, the order below is reversed, with costs.