Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
H. N. Johnson et al., Appellants, v. William G. McAdoo, Secretary of the United States Treasury Department, 1917 — 244 U.S. 643 · caselaw · US
General
H. N. Johnson et al., Appellants, v. William G. McAdoo, Secretary of the United States Treasury Department
244 U.S. 643·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 897.
H. N. Johnson et al., Appellants, v. William G. McAdoo, Secretary of the United States Treasury Department.
Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia^
Motion to affirm submitted April 30, 1917.
Decided May 7, 1917.
Mr. Cornelius J. Jones for appellants.
The Solicitor General for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Belknap v. Schild, 161 U. S. 10; Postal Supply Co. v. Bruce, 194 U. S. 601; Goldberg v. Daniels, 231 U. S. 218; Louisiana v. McAdoo, 234 U. S. 627.