Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert A. Miller, as Special Master, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Northern Assurance Company, 1906 — 203 U.S. 597 · caselaw · US
General
Robert A. Miller, as Special Master, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Northern Assurance Company
203 U.S. 597·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 61.
Robert A. Miller, as Special Master, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Northern Assurance Company.
October 9, 1906.
Mr. Fritz von Briesen for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. F._ H. Dexter for defendant, in error.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the District Court of. the United States for the District of Porto -Rico.
Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for the defendant in error.