Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE v. THE UNITED STATES, 1812 — 11 U.S. 107 · caselaw · US
Admiralty
HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE v. THE UNITED STATES
11 U.S. 1077 Cranch 107·Supreme Court of the United States·1812
Present....Ml the Judges. .
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE v. THE UNITED STATES.
Present....Ml the Judges. .
This Court take new evidence to be . used here, m mSty0Jurisdiction,
THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the District. Court, át New Orleans, condemning the Brig Claiborne, for violating a law of the United States.
Hare, Moved for a certiorari upon a suggestion of diminution of the record, in not sending up the tlejlositions of the witnesseses.
[MAJORITY — Marshall, Ch, J.]
Marshall, Ch, J.
What prevents you from producing the witnesses here, or taking their depositions de novo,
Hare, Suggested a doubt, whether cases fot1 violation of the Embargo, are cases of admiralty, or of prize jurisdiction,
However, on a subsequent day he moved •for', and bbtained a commission to take the depositions of witnesses at New Orleans, to be*used on the trial in this Court, at ..the next term.
A like commission was granted in the case of Williams and Jlrmroyd, at this term.