Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Slocum et al. v. First National Bank of Chicago et al., 1941 — 312 U.S. 678 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Slocum et al. v. First National Bank of Chicago et al.
312 U.S. 678·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 620.
Slocum et al. v. First National Bank of Chicago et al.
January 13, 1941.
Mr. Meyer Abrams for petitioners. Messrs. Max Swiren and Frank H. Towner for the First National Bank et aL; and Mr. Claire W. Hardy for A. C. Allyn & Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court, 1st District, of Illinois, denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.