General
James Keegan et al., Respondents, v. John Smith, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
172 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Keegan et al., Respondents, v. John Smith, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Keegan v. Smith, 60 App. Div. 168, affirmed.
(Argued October 14, 1902;
decided October 28, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment entered May 22, 1901, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which reversed a determination of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the City Court of the city of New York and affirmed such City Court-judgment.
Oeorge 8. Hamlim, and Andrew M. Olute for appellant.
Dermis McMahon for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
. Concur : Parker, Oh. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.