Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniel R. Lyddy, as Executor, etc., Appellant and Respondent, v. Selah Chamberlain, Appellant and Respondent, 1885 — 98 N.Y. 677 · caselaw · US
General
Daniel R. Lyddy, as Executor, etc., Appellant and Respondent, v. Selah Chamberlain, Appellant and Respondent
98 N.Y. 677·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel R. Lyddy, as Executor, etc., Appellant and Respondent, v. Selah Chamberlain, Appellant and Respondent.
(Argued March 9, 1885;
decided April 14, 1885.)
Decided upon the facts.
Robert Sewell for plaintiff.
Francis N. Bangs for defendant.
[MAJORITY — Finch, J.,]
Finch, J.,
reads for affirmance on appeal of plaintiff, and for reversal and new trial on defendant’s appeal.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.