Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People, Appellant, v. Arthur Cipperly, Respondent, 1886 — 101 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
The People, Appellant, v. Arthur Cipperly, Respondent
101 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People, Appellant, v. Arthur Cipperly, Respondent.
(Argued December 21, 1885;
decided January 19, 1886.)
Reported below, 37 Hun, 324.
Decided on grounds stated in dissenting opinion of Learned, J., in court below.
D. Cady Herrick for appellant.
Eugene Burlingame for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam mem.]
Per Curiam mem.
for reversal of judgment of General Term and for affirmance of judgment of Special Sessions.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.