Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Kathleen SULLIVAN, by W. T. Scarborough, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Joseph E. CURRY et al., etc., Appellees, 1930 — 44 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Kathleen SULLIVAN, by W. T. Scarborough, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Joseph E. CURRY et al., etc., Appellees
44 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Kathleen SULLIVAN, by W. T. Scarborough, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Joseph E. CURRY et al., etc., Appellees.
No. 6267.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 13, 1930.
For opinion below see 40 F.(2d) 948.
Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to motion of appellees, ordered appeal dismissed for failure of appellant to file record and docket cause.