Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Betsey Post, Respondent, v. Leonidas B. Benchley et al., Appellants, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 665 · caselaw · US
General
Betsey Post, Respondent, v. Leonidas B. Benchley et al., Appellants
110 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Betsey Post, Respondent, v. Leonidas B. Benchley et al., Appellants.
(Submitted October 2, 1888;
decided October 9, 1888.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made April 14, 1888, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment herein.
W. H. Shuart for motion.
Smith & Steel opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.