Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
STEEL & IRON CORPORATION, a Corporation, and Bardach Iron & Steel Company, Incorporated, a Corporation, Appellants, v. PENDLETON BROS., Incorporated, a Corporation, Appellee, 1925 — 7 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
Corporations
STEEL & IRON CORPORATION, a Corporation, and Bardach Iron & Steel Company, Incorporated, a Corporation, Appellants, v. PENDLETON BROS., Incorporated, a Corporation, Appellee
7 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
STEEL & IRON CORPORATION, a Corporation, and Bardach Iron & Steel Company, Incorporated, a Corporation, Appellants, v. PENDLETON BROS., Incorporated, a Corporation, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
September 1, 1925.)
No. 2386.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Norfolk.
Gerould M. Rumble and Bruce Lowenberg, both of Norfolk, Va., for appellants. Barron F. Black and Hughes, Vandeventer & Eggleston, all of Norfolk, Va., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Cause dismissed, at cost of appellants, under rule 20, in accordance with agreement of counsel.