Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WALLACE, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1967 — 389 U.S. 215 · caselaw · US
General
WALLACE, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
389 U.S. 215·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WALLACE, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 489.
Decided December 4, 1967.
MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and John C. Satterfield for appellants in No. 489. Reid B. Barnes for appellants in No. 671.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Doar, Louis F. Claiborne and David L. Norman for the United States in No. 489; Solicitor General Gris-wold and Assistant Attorney General Doar for the United States in No. 671; Fred D. Gray, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles H. Jones, Jr., Charles Stephen Ralston and Melvyn Zarr for Lee et al. in both eases, appellees.
Together with No. 671, Bibb County Board of Education et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.