General
Easley v. United States; Hardy v. West et al.; Holston v. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; Pierson v. Orlando Health, fka Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, Inc., et al.; Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons; Histon v. Chappell, Warden; Hall v. Cain, Warden; Solis v. California; Washington v. Virga, Warden; Nourn v. Lattimore, Warden; Pugh v. Olde Pink House Restaurant; Hamilton v. Chicago Insurance Co.; Johnson v. British Petroleum of America; Jones v. University of Rochester; Cox v. Biscoe et al.; Johnson v. Ohio; Howard v. Howard et al.; Richardson v. United States; Wilkinson v. Holland, Acting Warden; Bermudez v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review; McCallister v. McCallister; Boyd v. Lee, Warden; Portillo v. United States, In re Balzarotti, Powdrill v. United States; Parikh v. United Parcel Service et al.; Compton v. United States
568 U.S. 1221·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10-11255.
No. 11-10412.
No. 11-10740.
No. 12-568.
No. 12-5306.
Easley v. United States, Hardy v. West et al., Holston v. Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Pierson v. Orlando Health, fka Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, Inc., et al., Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Histon v. Chappell, Warden, Hall v. Cain, Warden, Solis v. California, Washington v. Virga, Warden, Nourn v. Lattimore, Warden, Pugh v. Olde Pink House Restaurant, Hamilton v. Chicago Insurance Co., Johnson v. British Petroleum of America, Jones v. University of Rochester, Cox v. Biscoe et al., Johnson v. Ohio, Howard v. Howard et al., Richardson v. United States, Wilkinson v. Holland, Acting Warden, Bermudez v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, McCallister v. McCallister, Boyd v. Lee, Warden, Portillo v. United States, In re Balzarotti, Powdrill v. United States, Parikh v. United Parcel Service et al., Compton v. United States,
[MAJORITY]
565 U. S. 875;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 859;
ante, p. 1123;
ante, p. 1144;
No. 12-5319.
No. 12-5436.
No. 12-6380.
No. 12-6677.
No. 12-6691.
No. 12-6846.
No. 12-6851.
No. 12-6902.
No. 12-6962.
No. 12-7034.
No. 12-7044.
No. 12-7075.
No. 12-7137.
No. 12-7160.
No. 12-7245.
No. 12-7275.
No. 12-7290.
No. 12-7342.
No. 12-7482.
No. 12-7492.
No. 12-7499.
No. 12-7638.
ante, p. 1126;
ante, p. 1114;
ante, p. 1033;
ante, p. 1094;
ante, p. 1095;
ante, p. 1098;
ante, p. 1098;
ante, p. 1100;
ante, P-1102;
ante, p. 1126;
ante, p. 1127;
ante, p. 1127;
ante, p. 1075;
ante, p. 1128;
ante, p. 1106;
ante, p. 1130;
ante, p. 1131;
ante, p. 1109;
ante, p. 1084;
ante, p. 1112;
ante, P-1133; and
ante, p. 1134. Petitions for rehearing denied.