Contracts · MBE-tested
ETCHIESON v. TEXAS
378 U.S. 58912 L. Ed. 2d 1041·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in Aguilar v. Texas.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ETCHIESON v. TEXAS.
No. 1050, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Clyde W. Woody for petitioner.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for consideration in light of Aguilar v. Texas, ante, p. 108.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in Aguilar v. Texas.