General
Perez v. Brownell, Attorney General
354 U.S. 934·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 572.
Perez v. Brownell, Attorney General.
Argued May 1, 1957.
Charles A. Horsky, Fred Okrand, A. L. Wirin, Jack Wasserman and Salvatore C. J. Fusco for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Oscar H. Davis and /. F. Bishop for respondent. John W. Willis filed a brief for Mendoza-Martinez, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 352 U. S. 908, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.