Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Graham and Morton Transportation Company, Appellant, v. Craig Shipbuilding Company, 1906 — 203 U.S. 577 · caselaw · US
General
The Graham and Morton Transportation Company, Appellant, v. Craig Shipbuilding Company
203 U.S. 577·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 339.
The Graham and Morton Transportation Company, Appellant, v. Craig Shipbuilding Company.
Submitted October 9, 1906.
Decided October 15, 1906.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Per Curiam.
Decree affirmed with costs, on the authority of People’s Ferry Company v. Beers, 20 How. 393; Roach v. Chapman, 22 How. 129; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 Wall. 532; The Robert W. Parsons, 191 U. S. 17, and cases cited.
Mr. Charles E. Kremer for appellant. Mr. Harvey D. Goxuder, Mr. S. H. Holding and Mr. Frank S. Masten for appellee.