Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence H. St. Clair, Appellant, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 578 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence H. St. Clair, Appellant
179 N.Y. 578·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence H. St. Clair, Appellant.
People v. St Clair, 90 A'pp. Div. 239, reversed.
(Submitted October 7, 1904;
decided October 25, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the. Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 28, 1904, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York, convicting the defendant of a violation of section 675 of the Penal Code.
James W. Osborne, Otto T. Hess and William H. Wherry, Jr., for appellant.
William Travers Jerome, District Attorney (Howard S. Gams of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction reversed and defendant discharged on the authority of People v. Weiler (179 N. Y. 46).
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray and Haight, JJ.